The 12 universal laws are considered intrinsic and immutable laws of our universe that ancient cultures have always known intuitively. Necessitarians claim a number of examples, which, they say, can only be explained by postulating a sixth necessary condition for natural laws, namely, by postulating natural necessity (physical/nomic/nomology). Simply put, there is no separation because everything, including you, is spirit. The only difference is the rate of vibration, as the third of the Universal Laws tells us. The same pattern is expressed on all planes of existence, from the smallest electron to the largest star, from the visible physical plane to the invisible spiritual plane. The way we look at Gresham`s „law,“ according to regularists, should be the way we see all natural laws. The laws of physics and chemistry are no different from the laws of economics. All the laws of nature—physics, chemistry, biology, economics, psychology, sociology, etc.—are no more and no less than a certain subclass of) true statements. Another philosophical intuition that gave rise to the belief in necessitarianism was the belief that in order to explain why one event happened and not another, one must argue that the event that occurred „had to happen“ given the laws of nature and previous conditions. In short, the belief is that natural laws can be used to explain the occurrence of events, random generalizations – „mere truths without nominal force“ – cannot be used in this way. Of the seven universal laws, the first three are the higher immutable laws, which means that they are absolute and eternal. They can never be changed or transcended.

They have always existed and will always exist. The other four of the seven universal laws are the inferior changing laws, meaning they are transitory and can be transcended or worked to create an ideal inner and outer world. This is not to say that you should ignore the four changing laws or try to challenge them, because even if you do, they will still govern your existence. Your goal is to understand each of the seven universal laws, and then learn to transcend or master the lower laws through your knowledge and understanding of the higher laws. As above, so below. As inside, so outside. It is the law of correspondence, in so many words. The universal law of correspondence states that the principles or laws of physics that explain the physical world, energy, light, vibration and motion have their corresponding principles in the etheric or higher universe; which is not material. Basically, what is above is like what is below, and what is below is like what is above. So if you put it more simply, what you think or feel is exactly what`s going on outside of your mind and body. And it refers to any object, place, or person you come into contact with.

If you think hatred, hatred is what corresponds externally through you. And so, according to the principles and the law, you must recover the same hatred of a person, a place, an object or a circumstance. Your outer life and environment are a reflection of what you think and feel in yourself. When you feel wasted in your head and heart, it is reflected in the way you work outdoors, the way you keep your office or even your space private. When you are in a calm state of mind inside, your external environment resonates with this sense of calm. And that`s why it`s humanly difficult, and sometimes even impossible, to come into conflict with how we feel inside. Because it`s hard to feel happy on the inside and pretend to be angry on the outside; Or feel depressed from the inside out and act like we`re doing absolutely well on the outside. This is also the reason why sometimes most of what we want never manifests because we constantly lie and deny our rawest and most sincere thoughts and feelings. And it goes into everything from our health, our jobs, our money and even our relationships. But, say the necessary, the statement „No moa lives beyond the age of n“ is not a law of nature. It is counterintuitive to believe that such a statement could be on the same (metaphysical) basis as „There is no perpetual motion machine of the first type“ or, to cite another example, „No object with mass is accelerated beyond the speed of light.“ These last declarations are true laws of nature; The first is a simple „accidental“ truth.

The difference lies in the (alleged) fact that the last two cases (about the perpetual motion machine and mass objects) are physically necessary truths; The first (about moas) is a purely accidental truth. To use Popper`s terminology, the true laws of nature „forbid“ certain things; Accidental truths do not. Let`s say the oldest moa – let`s call him Ludwig – died of an intestinal infection at the age of (say) 12. (I have no idea how long moas average lives. It is not relevant to our objectives.) Now suppose Louis has a younger brother, Johann, who hatched from the same clutch an hour later than Ludwig himself. Poor Johann – he was shot by a hunter 10 minutes before Ludwig died of his illness. But if Johann hadn`t been shot, he would certainly have been older than Ludwig. Unlike his older brother (very slightly), Johann was in excellent health. Johann was well on his way to surviving Ludwig; It`s just that a hunter sent him back prematurely. His death was a misfortune; It was not prescribed by a law of nature.

Recent research (e.g. J. Wright and von Beauchamp and Rosenberg) convincingly argue that the widespread view of what David Hume proposed as an explanation of the concept of natural law was quite wrong, in fact the exact opposite of what Hume argued. What was historically called the „human“ representation of the laws of nature until the end of the twentieth century was a misnomer. Hume himself was not a „Humae“ in terms of natural laws. It turns out that Hume was a necessity – that is, he believed that natural laws are somehow „necessary“ (although not logically necessary, of course). His legendary skepticism was epistemological. He was worried, even astonished, to see how our knowledge of physical necessity could arise. Experience has shown that what is the origin of the idea? Experience has shown what proves the existence of the property? He couldn`t find anything that played such a role. But for the Necessary, the way the world is cannot be the low point. After all, they will insist, there must be a reason, an explanation, why the world is the way it is and not otherwise.

For example, it cannot simply be that all electrons, trillions and trillions of them, all carry the same electric charge as each other – that would be a cosmic coincidence of unimaginable improbability.