Legal Aspects of Speculation

For example, real estate can blur the line between investment and speculation when real estate is purchased with the intention of renting it. Although it is considered an investment, buying several condos with a minimum down payment for the purpose of a quick resale at a profit would undoubtedly be considered speculation. Expert witnesses may be asked to explain a health problem or how a particular type of accident could cause a particular injury. In this way, they are allowed to help the court fill in gaps in difficult concepts. This is not speculation because they do not give their opinion on what happened in your particular case unless they have looked at the relevant documents. Rather, they are there to help the court understand if your claim is possible. For example, a sale of foreign currency as part of a bond purchase can be considered either as a hedge on the value of the bond or as general speculation. These relationships can be complicated to define if the currency position is bought and sold multiple times while the fund holds the underlying bond. A variety of legal and common law doctrines in American law demonstrate hostility to speculation. However, conventional economic theory generally views speculation as an effective form of trading that transfers risk to those who can bear it most easily and improves the accuracy of market prices.

This article balances the apparent conflict between legal tradition and economic theory by explaining why some forms of speculative trading can be ineffective. It presents a heterogeneous expectation model of speculative trading that provides important information on anti-speculative law in general and the ongoing debate on over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives in particular. Although OTC derivatives trading is currently largely unregulated, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission recently announced its intention to consider substantial regulation of OTC derivatives under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA). Given that the CEA is essentially an anti-speculation law, the model of heterogeneous expectations of speculation provides political support for the CFTC`s claim to regulatory jurisdiction. However, this model also offers an alternative to the seemingly binary choice now available to legislators (i.e. regulating OTC derivatives under the CEA or exempting them). This approach would be to regulate OTC derivatives in the same way that the common law traditionally governs speculative contracts, that is, as permitted but legally unenforceable arrangements. By requiring derivatives brokers to rely on private orders to ensure compliance with their agreements, this strategy can offer significant benefits by preventing welfare-reducing speculation based on heterogeneous expectations, while protecting more advantageous forms of derivatives trading. In 1936, John Maynard Keynes wrote: „Speculators cannot do anything wrong like bubbles on a steady flow of corporations. But the situation is serious when companies become a bubble in a whirlwind of speculation. (1936:159)“[16] Keynes himself enjoyed speculation to the fullest and directed an early precursor to a hedge fund.

As a trustee of King`s College, University of Cambridge, he managed two mutual funds, one of which, called the Chest Fund, not only invested in then-„emerging“ U.S. equities, but to a lesser extent regularly included commodity futures and foreign currencies (see Chua and Woodward, 1983). His fund was profitable almost every year, averaging 13% a year, even during the Great Depression, thanks to very modern investment strategies that included diversification between markets (he invested in stocks, commodities and currencies) and short selling (selling borrowed stocks or futures contracts to profit from falling prices), which Keynes advocated in his 1933 report according to the principles of successful investment: „A balanced investment position. and, if possible, the opposite risks.“ [17] When a witness begins to express his or her opinion or to guess what happened, it is called speculation. An experienced lawyer in Georgia can make sure you have the best case possible. Mutual funds and hedge funds often speculate in the foreign exchange, bond and stock markets. From Texas tycoon T. Boone Pickens to the former Enron conglomerate, grandiose plans have spread over the past decade to benefit from large-scale water transfers across the basin.

Reactions range from outrage to commercialization of this precious resource to support the market and its price signals for the most efficient use of water. The long-standing ban on water speculation is a barrier to the commercialization and thus commercialization of water in the western United States. Acquiring real estate, grain, artwork and other types of real estate in the hope of profiting from future market fluctuations, on the other hand, is by no means uncommon. If water speculation were allowed, speculators could buy water rights, not to immediately use or sell the water or its derivatives, but to hoard the water, hoping that its value would increase over time. But preventing individuals and communities in immediate need from quenching their thirst or growing crops they can feed on is considered a mortal sin under Western water law. This article notes that the anti-speculative doctrine continues to serve an important public purpose. It curbs the worst potential abuses of market forces by requiring parties to specify how and when water is used for real and useful purposes, and by providing administrative or judicial „control“ of speculative transactions that harm third parties and environmental needs by depriving them of water. In addition, exemptions for municipal planning, reserved Indian rights, and stream flow protection act as an effective safety valve for collaborative initiatives for specific purposes that serve important and contemporary public objectives.

In 1935, the Indian government passed a law allowing it to partially restrict and directly control food production (Defence of India Act, 1935). This included the possibility of restricting or prohibiting trade in derived products on food.